Wednesday February 19th, 2020
TEXT_SIZE

Final 2013 Nationwide Conference USSSA Computer Rankings!

Note Your team must currently have at least 15 games against 'B' or higher opponents to be ranked.

An interesting fact is that Resmondo in 2013 finished with a 6.16 average per upper level game while in 2012 they finished with a 4.12. 

Laservision in 2013 finished with a 4.35 while in 2012 they finished with just a 3.17.  Of course this years 4.35 would have been good enough for first place in the computer rankings last year.

I am not sure if this means the top two teams got better or 2-35 didn't play as well?  Probably a combination of the two.

 

 

2013 Nationwide Conference USSSA

 

Computer Rankings

 

brought to you by

 

Based on 29 Tournaments, and Major, A and B Worlds (9/24/2013)                                        
                Wins Loss Win Gm vs           W L W L W L W L
      Total Avg     Win vs vs % M,A,B           vs vs vs vs vs vs vs vs
  CLS Team Name Pts Pts W L % Upper Upper Upper Teams 1st 2nd 3rd 4th   M M A A B B C C
1 M resmondo – specialty tank / worth 339 6.16 59 5 92% 50 5 91% 55 10 1 0 0 0 16 4 21 1 13 0 6 0
2 M laservision/desertfalls/boombah/eas 248 4.35 52 19 73% 39 18 68% 57 3 6 1 0 0 14 14 16 4 9 0 9 1
3 A Nordkap/Suncoast Reebok 128 2.46 41 21 66% 31 21 60% 52 1 2 1 0 0 5 10 15 10 11 1 5 0
4 M shoppe / tyja / louisville slugger 112 2.43 37 19 66% 27 19 59% 46 0 1 4 2 0 2 13 15 6 10 0 5 0
5 A line drive sportz/sss/miken 128 2.29 46 24 66% 32 24 57% 56 1 0 4 3 0 4 9 17 13 11 2 9 0
6 A demarini/dirty/xtremeathletics 96 2.23 32 17 65% 26 17 60% 43 2 0 1 2 0 3 7 10 9 13 1 5 0
7 A albicocco/the scene/easton 93 2.02 34 20 63% 27 19 59% 46 1 1 2 1 0 4 3 11 13 12 3 6 1
8 A gtl doerflinger r&m/easton 96 1.96 36 21 63% 29 20 59% 49 0 3 1 1 0 3 8 12 8 14 4 4 1
9 C classic glass/ easton/dssbats 41 1.71 24 10 71% 14 10 58% 24 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 10 4 6 0
10 A red's astros/slugger/stucco/dirty 74 1.57 32 23 58% 25 22 53% 47 0 2 1 1 0 3 7 10 14 12 1 5 1
11 B Chaps/BWW/Worth/Buzini 51 1.28 36 20 64% 22 18 55% 40 2 0 1 1 0 2 6 5 8 15 4 11 2
12 A taylormade/tm sports/mizuno 33 0.89 25 18 58% 20 17 54% 37 0 1 1 0 0 1 6 5 5 14 6 4 1
13 A Sonny's 20 0.71 26 14 65% 15 13 54% 28 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 8 12 5 7 1
14 M team combat/lbg/derby boys 21 0.57 32 23 58% 15 22 41% 37 1 1 1 1 0 0 4 8 9 7 9 14 1
15 B OC SWATS/EASTON 15 0.54 30 18 63% 17 11 61% 28 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 6 8 11 3 8 7
16 B Famous/Premier/Easton 11 0.44 32 18 64% 11 14 44% 25 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 3 10 6 4 12 4
17 B team adiktiv/dynasty/d2e/ls/ytja 15 0.37 29 21 58% 22 19 54% 41 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 10 20 9 2 2
18 A 4 The Fallen/ Miken 7 0.32 17 16 52% 9 13 41% 22 1 1 0 0 0 1 4 3 3 5 6 5 3
19 B pure romance/chic's/insanity/easton 6 0.17 27 22 55% 15 20 43% 35 0 0 0 1 0 1 5 6 8 8 7 12 2
20 B 3rd street/louisville slugger 1 0.03 23 20 53% 16 18 47% 34 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 3 10 12 7 5 1
21 B precision/hang rite athletics 0 0.00 21 21 50% 13 20 39% 33 0 0 0 1 0 2 4 2 10 9 6 7 1
22 A baugh ford/mojo/louisville slugger -1 -0.03 29 24 55% 18 21 46% 39 1 1 0 0 0 0 6 2 6 16 9 6 3
23 B head hunters / oi livingston / mwa -8 -0.27 21 20 51% 10 20 33% 30 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 2 8 7 10 8 0
24 C trust/ detroit elite/ easton/ mojo -7 -0.30 14 16 47% 8 15 35% 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 4 4 6 6 1
25 B ASPNation.com/Easton -9 -0.35 24 17 59% 11 15 42% 26 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 2 9 11 9 2
26 B b&b/sears/bmw insulation/easton -10 -0.45 14 14 50% 10 12 45% 22 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 10 9 1 2
27 B fence brokers/hubs pub/gts/worth -16 -0.53 29 23 56% 10 20 33% 30 1 0 0 1 0 0 4 3 9 7 7 13 3
28 B XTREME/Miken -14 -0.61 21 17 55% 9 14 39% 23 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 2 2 7 9 10 3
29 B Old School/Elite -11 -0.73 18 10 64% 7 8 47% 15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 7 6 2
30 B DEI/S&S/Scott's/Easton -21 -0.84 13 17 43% 9 16 36% 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 6 8 8 4 1
31 B p&p333/suburban/larry/mojo/easton -37 -2.06 14 18 44% 5 13 28% 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 5 4 6 7 5
32 C TG Brand.MOJO.Easton -34 -2.13 13 16 45% 5 11 31% 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 3 9 1 5
33 B primetime/easton/elite/broughton rx -38 -2.24 9 16 36% 2 15 12% 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 2 9 4 1
34 B South Texas Posse -47 -3.13 11 18 38% 2 13 13% 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 2 6 5 4

The minimum number of Conference games 'B' and above games to be eligible for the Computer Rankings will change as more tournaments are played.    The computer rankings rules have been unchanged since its beginning in 2008.
           
The Rankings are sorted by Average Points per game against at least 15 'B' teams or higher.    
           
Rankings Formula explained:         
           
Each team receives:          
 8 points for defeating a Major class team        
 5 points for defeating an A class team        
 2 points for defeating a B class team        
           
Each team receives an additional:        
 8 points for winning a tournament        
 6 points for finishing 2nd         
 4 points for finishing 3rd         
 2 points for finishing 4th         
           
And finally each team has their point total reduced by:       
 1 point for each time they lose to a major team       
 2 points for losing to an A team         
 3 points for losing to a B team         
 4 points for losing to a C team         
 6 points for losing to a D team         
 8 points for losing to an E team.         
           
Each teams total points are then divided by the number of games they have played against upper level (Major, A, and B) teams.
           
So the formula in mathmatical terms would be:        
           
AveragePointsPerGame =          
((WM*8)+(WinA*5)+(WinB*2)         
+((WinTourny*8)+(2ndTourny*6)+(3rdTourny*4)+(4thTourny*2))      
-((LossM*1)+(LossA*2)+(LossB*3)+(LossC*4)+(LossD*6)+(LossE*8)))      
/ (total games vs M, A, B)         
           
In short the formula is:
           
AveragePointsPerGame =         
((weighted wins against upper teams)        
+ (weighted top 4 in tournament finishes)        
– (weighted losses))          
/ (# of upper games)          
           
The average points per game is then sorted highest to lowest and those are the rankings.

 

 

 

2 responses to “Final 2013 Nationwide Conference USSSA Computer Rankings!”

  1. 9 says:

    why is Classic Glass “C”?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.