2010 Conference USSSA Final Computer Rankings (After Major World)
Final 2010 Computer Rankings
Interesting that 5th through 15th finished very close. Team Combat made a great run in the 2nd half of the season to finish 6th after a very slow start. 4 of the top 8 were 'B' teams. FBI went from 12th to 6th with their 3rd place finish at the Major.
| Based on 22 Conf tourny's, Major Worlds, 'A' Worlds, 'B' Worlds, Conf Championships, and a minimum of 12 games vs upper level opponents |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Wins | Loss | Win | Gm vs | Wins | Loss | Wins | Loss | Wins | Loss | Wins | Loss | Wins | Loss | Wins | Loss | ||||||||||||
| Total | Avg | Total | Total | Total | vs | vs | % | M,A,B | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | vs | vs | vs | vs | vs | vs | vs | vs | vs | vs | vs | vs | |||
| Rnk | Cls | Team Name | Points | Points | Wins | Loss | Win% | M,A,B | M,A,B | M,A,B | Teams | Place | Place | Place | Place | Major | Major | A | A | B | B | C | C | D | D | E | E |
| 1 | M | resmondosport/specialty/phonemaster | 278 | 4.88 | 60 | 11 | 85% | 46 | 11 | 81% | 57 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 7 | 18 | 3 | 18 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | M | Dan Smith/Menosse | 270 | 4.22 | 61 | 16 | 79% | 48 | 16 | 75% | 64 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 10 | 24 | 4 | 17 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | A | GTL CARTEL/WORTH | 151 | 2.80 | 48 | 22 | 69% | 32 | 22 | 59% | 54 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 15 | 10 | 12 | 4 | 12 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | B | LOGO EXPRESS | 79 | 1.72 | 33 | 19 | 63% | 27 | 19 | 59% | 46 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 10 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | B | fence brokers/gametime supply/worth | 60 | 1.33 | 31 | 20 | 61% | 26 | 19 | 58% | 45 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | A | team combat / laser vision | 57 | 1.33 | 43 | 22 | 66% | 22 | 21 | 51% | 43 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 5 | 12 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| 7 | B | Pipac/TCP/Easton | 30 | 1.20 | 26 | 12 | 68% | 14 | 11 | 56% | 25 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 8 | B | ajs/easton/supreme/mike foulks/mojo | 56 | 1.19 | 42 | 22 | 66% | 26 | 21 | 55% | 47 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 14 | 9 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 9 | A | Wood Law/Miken | 42 | 1.08 | 27 | 20 | 57% | 20 | 19 | 51% | 39 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | A | aubrey's/taylormade/mizuno | 41 | 1.00 | 32 | 20 | 62% | 22 | 19 | 54% | 41 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 10 | 14 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | B | EWS/SHIRTS and LOGOS | 53 | 0.96 | 43 | 27 | 61% | 29 | 26 | 53% | 55 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 8 | 17 | 15 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | A | sinister/line drive/sss/worth/mojo | 50 | 0.94 | 37 | 29 | 56% | 24 | 29 | 45% | 53 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | A | northwest combat/ cj financial | 32 | 0.94 | 28 | 21 | 0.571 | 15 | 19 | 44% | 34 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 9 | 5 | 7 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | A | jean shoppe-easton-down2earthsports | 40 | 0.93 | 39 | 22 | 64% | 21 | 22 | 49% | 43 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 11 | 7 | 13 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 15 | A | albicocco's/the scene/worth | 32 | 0.80 | 30 | 22 | 58% | 19 | 21 | 48% | 40 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 11 | 11 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 16 | B | Darkside/TYJA | 10 | 0.43 | 27 | 13 | 68% | 12 | 11 | 52% | 23 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | B | Hub's Pub | 17 | 0.43 | 31 | 20 | 61% | 20 | 20 | 50% | 40 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | B | KTI/Cartel DeMarini | 4 | 0.33 | 9 | 6 | 60% | 6 | 6 | 50% | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | C | down 2 earth sports/ worth | 2 | 0.17 | 12 | 6 | 67% | 6 | 6 | 50% | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 20 | B | elite sports u.s.a./combat | -4 | -0.16 | 24 | 15 | 62% | 13 | 12 | 52% | 25 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 21 | B | Desert Falls/Elite/Miken | -5 | -0.19 | 23 | 17 | 58% | 11 | 16 | 41% | 27 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | A | Suncoast / Reebok | -6 | -0.19 | 24 | 22 | 52% | 13 | 19 | 41% | 32 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | B | FamousSports.com/Easton | -6 | -0.25 | 22 | 14 | 61% | 12 | 12 | 50% | 24 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 24 | B | blitz/watanabe/weller/minges/easton | -22 | -0.96 | 24 | 16 | 60% | 8 | 15 | 35% | 23 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 25 | B | fowl ball sports/gas-it/easton | -24 | -1.41 | 16 | 14 | 53% | 4 | 13 | 24% | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 26 | B | MidWest Swing | -29 | -2.23 | 12 | 14 | 46% | 4 | 9 | 31% | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | B | Art Explosion/drash | -35 | -2.92 | 7 | 13 | 35% | 2 | 10 | 17% | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
|
Rankings are based upon 2010 Conference Tournament Results only. |
|||||||||||
| The Rankings are created based upon a minimum of 12 games against B teams or higher. | |||||||||||
| The minimum number of Conference games will change as more tournaments are played. | |||||||||||
| The Rankings are sorted by Average Points per game against B teams or higher. | |||||||||||
| Rankings Formula explained: | |||||||||||
| Each team receives: | |||||||||||
| 8 points for defeating a Major class team | |||||||||||
| 5 points for defeating an A class team | |||||||||||
| 2 points for defeating a B class team | |||||||||||
| Each team receives an additional: | |||||||||||
| 8 points for winning a tournament | |||||||||||
| 6 points for finishing 2nd | |||||||||||
| 4 points for finishing 3rd | |||||||||||
| 2 points for finishing 4th | |||||||||||
| And finally each team has their point total reduced by: | |||||||||||
| 1 point for each time they lose to a major team | |||||||||||
| 2 points for losing to an A team | |||||||||||
| 3 points for losing to a B team | |||||||||||
| 4 points for losing to a C team | |||||||||||
| 6 points for losing to a D team | |||||||||||
| 8 points for losing to an E team. | |||||||||||
| Each teams total points are then divided by the number of games they have played against upper level (Major, A, and B) teams. | |||||||||||
| So the formula in mathmatical terms would be: | |||||||||||
| AveragePointsPerGame = | |||||||||||
| ((WM*8)+(WinA*5)+(WinB*2) | |||||||||||
| +((WinTourny*8)+(2ndTourny*6)+(3rdTourny*4)+(4thTourny*2)) | |||||||||||
| -((LossM*1)+(LossA*2)+(LossB*3)+(LossC*4)+(LossD*6)+(LossE*8))) | |||||||||||
| / (total games vs M, A, B) | |||||||||||
| For short the formula is | |||||||||||
| AveragePointsPerGame = | |||||||||||
| ((weighted wins against upper teams) | |||||||||||
| + (weighted top 4 in tournament finishes) | |||||||||||
| - (weighted losses)) | |||||||||||
| / (# of upper games) | |||||||||||
| The average points per game is then sorted highest to lowest and those are the rankings. | |||||||||||
Joomla Templates and Joomla Extensions by ZooTemplate.Com
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Related Articles
- - 2008 Conference USSSA Final Computer Rankings after (After Major World Series)
- - 2011 Conference USSSA Final Computer Rankings after (After Major World Series)
- - 2012 Conference USSSA Computer Rankings after Phoenix and KC
- - 2012 Conference USSSA Computer Rankings after Euless, Texas
- - 2012 Conference USSSA Computer Rankings after Columbus, Indiana


